You’d think that by the time a person turns 60 she would have
finally figured out how to get dressed. By this time she should possess a personal
style. She should instinctively know how to look like a million bucks at the
drop of a party invitation in the mail. You’d think that wouldn’t you? You would
be wrong. Oh, some of you out there may have gained this kind of confidence.
Me, not so much. I’d just like to show up in the right outfit one of these
days.
Take last Saturday night. I was a fashion fiasco. At a gala.
We left the house with me feeling sexy and snazzy in white linen pants and a poison-apple
green linen jacket. I thought my drop-dead gorgeous red sandals and matching
toe nail polish more than qualified me for doggone dressed-up. Until we got to
the event. The other women —all 400 other women, to be precise — were be-sequined
in off-the-shoulder, above-the-knee, cleavage-plunging cocktail dresses. Apparently
I missed this memo. I spent the evening trying to look nonchalant and
unwrinkled.
This wasn’t the first time that I’ve put a fashion foot
forward —and tripped. It all started with high school grad (American
translation: senior prom). All through school, I fantasized about being a
fashion designer. And so, when grad rolled around, it seemed like a great opportunity
to get creative. So, I went out shopping for a personal statement. And instead
of heading to Eaton’s department store for one of those filmy pastel ball gowns
with Empire waists, I went to my favorite hippy boutique, the Unicorn, and bought
a pant suit. Yes, a pant suit. C’mon! It was lace! And it was way cute. Really.
It was very fancy. I looked adorable. But NO ONE else wore a pant suit, lace or
otherwise. I totally stood alone, like
the proverbial cheese. My date spent the evening keeping his distance.
In hindsight, I should have gone with the flow in a flowing
gown. But I didn’t understand until years later that I much as I like to think
that I’m a non-conformist, I just don’t have the stylistic savvy to take this
to its ultimate sartorial expression. In other words, I’m not going to be
featured in Vogue any time soon and no one was writing a social notes column in
the New York Times about what I wore to grad.
It was easier when there were rules. Like in the 80s when we
working girls followed the “Guide to Being Preppy” or the “Dress for Success”
handbooks. You couldn’t go wrong with a blazer, a white blouse and a grey skirt
with black pumps. I gave in and followed the guidelines for a while and
actually wasted my youthful slenderness on drab, matronly dresses with Peter
Pan collars and tuck pleats. But the uniform started to chafe after a time. I
found myself terribly dissatisfied and seeking a look something more akin to Annie
Hall. But not even when I picked out one of my Dad’s ties to wear with all the
wrong things did it dawn on me that only Diane Keaton can look like Diane
Keaton. Dang!
Maybe there are rules after all that I just don’t know
about. Look at Hillary Clinton, for example. Do you think those pant suits
happen by accident? Not on your life! She’s got people. They’ve got rules. And
they’re telling her, “Yes, ma’am, that pant suit is perfect for your meeting
with Netanyahu. And it really doesn’t make your butt look big. Honest.” Or Kate Middleton. Do you think she’d have
captured the world’s adoration if she dressed like, oh, say, I don’t know,
Camilla? Not likely. She too has people.
Maybe I need people. I sure needed people last Saturday
night. Only I want people who know the rules for pulling off a Diane Keaton.
No comments:
Post a Comment